<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Armedia Blog &#187; Content Authoring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.armedia.com/blog/category/enterprise_content_management/content_authoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.armedia.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Destiny&#039;s child</title>
		<link>http://www.armedia.com/blog/2010/02/destinys-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.armedia.com/blog/2010/02/destinys-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Nasr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Authoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECM Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatwire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Publisher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armedia.com/blog/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impact of EMC's partnership with Fatwire to provide Web Content Management offerings in place of its own existing WCM products]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suspense builds. Tension unbearable. As the cards turn…it is, of course, Miss Scarlett (the old fishmonger, Mustard, was never cunning enough to pull this off), with the rope in the (WHAT?!) Library… Those of you with fond childhood, or more recent, memories of <a title="JimNasr_blog" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluedo" target="_blank">Cluedo</a> would have surely related to today’s <a title="JimNasr_blog" href="http://www.emc.com/about/news/press/2010/20100216-02.htm" target="_blank">EMC/Fatwire partnership</a> news. In the worst kept secret category, EMC has effectively chosen to supplant its own Web Content Management (WCM) offerings with Fatwire’s, best in class, offering and in-turn chip in with some DAM going the other way, and, interestingly, <em>only</em> take a minority equity stake at Fatwire.</p>
<p>Solution-wise, this is actually good news for clients…in the longterm: richer functionality, better ease of use, tight focus on WCM, proven winner. Ultimately, WCM to EMC Documentum was the Super G to <a title="JimNasr_blog" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Tomba" target="_blank">Tomba la Bomba</a>: good, but not quite <a title="JimNasr_blog" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kjetil_Andr%C3%A9_Aamodt" target="_blank">Aamodt-esque</a> (apologies in advance for the indulgence in Winter Olympics rhetoric; seemed appropriate though given the wall to wall TV coverage and the three feet of snow we&#8217;re in here in DC). However, this direction does pose some intriguing questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>How tightly would Fatwire’s product work with EMC Documentum? Whose repository rules when it comes to WCM? Can the repositories truly co-exist merrily (possibly through CMIS)? Emmm…what happened to the whole one repository thing?</li>
<li>What happens to clients’ existing Web Publisher (WP) based solution? Stick with it? Live without it? Migrate to Fatwire? Throw another 3<sup>rd</sup> party tool in the mix? Start from scratch? Chuck the whole thing and Salesforce.com it?</li>
<li>Operationally, who takes the lead, EMC Support or Fatwire? What about overlaps? How about licensing for existing solutions? Functionality vs. Risk?</li>
<li>Technically, what’s the impact? What would the security model look like? How do you migrate?</li>
<li>If the sunsetting of WDK and WP are both inevitable, what’s the recipe to upgrade? What tools and support will EMC provide to ease the process?</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course, this is not an exhaustive list of questions and sharper minds than mine will surely have scripted-answers for them and more. History, though, tells me to tread with caution. Inevitably, enterprise class solutions are burdened with enterprise class complexity (and likely not just because of the technology). Time, budget, people, skills, political battlegrounds, management knowhow and many other factors may well play a part and tint the lens with which you view the questions.</p>
<p>So, where else might destiny’s child poke its nose? Of course, I don’t know for a fact, nor would want to speculate. However, looking at the gaps in the kitbag of some of the larger ECM vendors, I can’t help but wonder whether the next case management, records management, ediscovery, collaboration (read: Sharepoint) or content migration “partnership” announcement is just around the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.armedia.com/blog/2010/02/destinys-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content Collection, Migration, and Delivery</title>
		<link>http://www.armedia.com/blog/2009/06/content-collection-migration-and-delivery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.armedia.com/blog/2009/06/content-collection-migration-and-delivery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kevans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alfresco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Authoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eDiscovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Health Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Content Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.armedia.com/blog/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are well over 35 proprietary document management systems, an astronomical number of homegrown document management systems, and billions of sources for information to come from.  As technology changes, new and better features are added to current systems, new products are coming out, and software systems frequently have to be upgraded.  As companies merge, workflows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">There are well over 35 proprietary document management systems, an astronomical number of homegrown document management systems, and billions of sources for information to come from.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>As technology changes, new and better features are added to current systems, new products are coming out, and software systems frequently have to be upgraded.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>As companies merge, workflows that were once adequate, no longer cover the bases for the growing needs of the “new” organization.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>What happens when companies merge and they were using two different document management systems?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Which one takes over?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Or do they continue to use both?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>As organizations grow, merge, and split, the number of input sources and output destinations dramatically increase.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>How do we integrate these new information pathways , along with new applications that are introduced, keeping you in the same locked in status? </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">It’s simple.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The new Content I/O Suite.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Armedia’s Content I/O Suite allows users to collect information from all of those billions of sources, migrate it to the centralized repository in the company, and then, if needed, deliver that information to the different web portals that may need to view the information later.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>In fact, it can even send the information to multiple repositories all from the same interface.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>So what if Human Resources uses Documentum, and Accounting uses Laserfiche, and some departments have their own collaborative eRoom set up, but you just merged with another company who uses SharePoint and FileNet.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>What if one user could capture the information coming in from the website, or through email, or through regular snail mail, and deliver it into the appropriate system, without that one user ever having to be trained in each of those systems?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Check it out at <a href="http://armedia.com/products/suite/">http://armedia.com/products/suite/</a>. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">-Kristin Evans</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.armedia.com/blog/2009/06/content-collection-migration-and-delivery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

